9/11 was ‘mother of all false flag attacks’: US scholar (Veterans Today)

The September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States have been covered-up by the FBI and senior US officials because it was the “mother of all false flag” operations, an American scholar in Wisconsin says.

“If people start looking hard at 9/11, the whole story is going to unravel and it’s going to be exposed as the mother of all false flag attacks and the most spectacular act of deception in human history and the FBI has been charged with covering it up,” said Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance.

The 9/11 attacks were designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they were carried out by Saudi Arabia, whereas senior US officials directly participated in the operation, Barrett told Press TV on Tuesday.

The so-called al-Qaeda terrorists who allegedly hijacked four planes and crashed them on September 11 were just “patsies who were falsely blamed for 9/11, they were set-up,” Dr. Barrett noted.

The September 11, 2001 attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks, was a series of strikes in the US which killed nearly 3,000 people and caused about $10 billion worth of property and infrastructure damage.

US officials assert that the attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists but many experts have raised questions about the official account.

They believe that rogue elements within the US government orchestrated or at least encouraged the 9/11 attacks in order to accelerate the US war machine and advance the Zionist agenda.

A special review commission on 9/11 has found that disagreements still persist within the FBI over whether there was a broader conspiracy in the US to carry out the 2001 attacks.

Aspects of the continuing inquiry, which is the largest in FBI history, suggests that others inside the US had advance knowledge of the operation and supported the suicide hijackers [who were not even on the planes].

Via: veteranstoday.com

9/11 Father Seeks Justice | The Bobby McIlvaine Act

This is Bobby McIlvaine’s dad. His son was found knocked out of his shoes with half of his head, chest and one arm was blown off. His body was in the morgue BEFORE the towers came down. An explosion caused this and it wasn’t a fireball coming down the only elevator shaft that went up to the impact zone because the man in the elevator lived. The explosion knocked the stonework off the core column walls and blew much of the lobby glass out onto the sidewalk. Glass was impregnated in Bobby’s chest. 118 firefighters witnessed explosions as well as maintenance worker William Rodriguez (from the 1st of 6 sub-level basements in WTC 1).

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

As millions of people are becoming aware that they haven’t gotten the whole story on 9/11, over 3200 architects & engineers are leading the way at AE911TRUTH, with dozens of these professionals giving testimonials in this documentary, putting their careers on the line in their demand for a new independent investigation. High-rise architects, structural engineers, scientists, physicists, chemists, scholars, educators, firefighters, forensic fire engineers, demolition experts, and others also testify in this ground-breaking scientific assessment of the events at the World Trade Center – Building 7.

Via: ae911truth.org

Flight Attendant sheds new light on 9/11.

Courtesy of: MrChrillemannen

We highly recommend these three documentaries which focus on the Pentagon

What Happened At the Pentagon?

In an interview, Albert N. Stubblebine III says he can conclusively prove that the Pentagon was not hit by a Boeing 757.

National Security Alert – 9/11 Pentagon Attack

from Citizen Investigation Team on Vimeo. Please visit CitizenInvestigationTeam.com for full resources and a step-by-step strategy as to how you can take action on this critical life or death information.

911: In Plane Site

Get the DVD at 911inplanesite.com

The “4” Flights of 9/11 – What about the Passengers? What happened to them?

by Phil Jayhan, Let’s Roll Forum, March 7, 2010

Most people are not aware that there are issues with the 4 groups of people who flew on the 4 flights of 9/11 from 3 locations. There are so many issues it would take a newsroom full of dedicated reporters a long time to sift through it all.

There are problems with the boarding of passengers on 3 flights. And on the 4th flight, we find 2 boardings, an unusual event to say the least. Two of the aircraft, we are to believe didn’t even take off on 9/11, as this is what registers in the BTS database for flights 11 & 77 on 911. Two of the aircraft that allegedly struck the towers, can be plausibly shown to be drones, calling into question both passenger and crew from those respective flights. (11 & 175) While flight 77 obviously didn’t crash at the Pentagon from all evidence shown, and flight 77 is one of the 2 flight which BTS shows no departure time for.

While flight 93 wasn’t even a regular flight on 9/11, it was created in the last 2 hours before it flew. And as you will see are good reasons to believe Flight 93 was boarded twice at Newark. If this sounds confusing, it is because it was meant to be so. But I believe this article shows it is possible to make some simple sense out of the day’s events and tie them all together.

Continue Reading at goldenageofgaia.com

FOLLOW THE MONEY!

9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon

Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11

Just after September 11th, 2001, many governments began investigations into possible insider trading related to the terrorist attacks of that day. Such investigations were initiated by the governments of Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United States, and others. Although the investigators were clearly concerned about insider trading, and considerable evidence did exist, none of the investigations resulted in a single indictment. That’s because the people identified as having been involved in the suspicious trades were seen as unlikely to have been associated with those alleged to have committed the 9/11 crimes.
This is an example of the circular logic often used by those who created the official explanations for 9/11. The reasoning goes like this: if we assume that we know who the perpetrators were (i.e. the popular version of “al Qaeda”) and those who were involved in the trades did not appear to be connected to those assumed perpetrators, then insider trading did not occur.
That’s basically what the 9/11 Commission told us. The Commission concluded that “exhaustive investigations” by the SEC and the FBI “uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions.” What they meant was that someone did profit through securities transactions but, based on the Commission’s assumptions of guilt, those who profited were not associated with those who were guilty of conducting the attacks. In a footnote, the Commission report acknowledged “highly suspicious trading on its face,” but said that this trading on United Airlines was traced back to “A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda.”
With respect to insider trading, or what is more technically called informed trading, the Commission report was itself suspect for several reasons. First, the informed trades relating to 9/11 covered far more than just airline company stock. The stocks of financial and reinsurance companies, as well as other financial vehicles, were identified as being associated with suspicious trades. Huge credit card transactions, completed just before the attacks, were also involved. The Commission ultimately tried to frame all of this highly suspicious trading in terms of a series of misunderstandings. However, the possibility that so many leading financial experts were so completely wrong is doubtful at best and, if true, would constitute another unbelievable scenario in the already highly improbable sequence of events represented by the official story of 9/11.
In the last few years, new evidence has come to light on these matters. In 2006 and 2010, financial experts at a number of universities have established new evidence, through statistical analyses, that informed trades did occur with respect to the 9/11 attacks. Additionally, in 2007, the 911 Commission released a memorandum summary of the FBI investigations on which its report was based. A careful review of this memorandum indicates that some of the people who were briefly investigated by the FBI, and then acquitted without due diligence, had links to al Qaeda and to US intelligence agencies. Although the elapsed time between the informed trades and these new confirmations might prevent legal action against the guilty, the facts of the matter can help lead us to the truth about 9/11.

Continue reading at deeppoliticsforum.com

An Examination of Faith

How America’s Faith Has Changed Since 9-11

Research Releases in Culture & Media • November 26, 2001

Social analysts point out that people turn to religion in times of crisis and instability. The terrorist attacks on September 11 certainly shattered the stability and comfort of American’s lives, leading to a surge in church attendance and Bible sales immediately after the attacks. But what is the lingering effect of the attack and continued tension on people’s religious beliefs and practices? Those questions are answered with startling clarity in a new survey released by the Barna Research Group of Ventura, California. Using 21 indicators of the nation’s spiritual climate, the study gives a comprehensive look at how people’s faith has changed in the aftermath of the terrorist attack.

Concern for the Future

Not surprisingly, there has been a significant upturn in people’s concern about the future. In August, 73% of adults said they were concerned about the future; by November, that figure had increased to 82%. The population segment that expressed the greatest concern was adults 35 and younger, among whom nearly nine out of ten said they were concerned. The biggest increases in concern were registered among people 55 and older (up 17 points from the pre-attack level) and atheists (also up 17 points).

Self-Image Remains Unchanged

Three aspects of people’s self-image did not change in the wake of the attacks. The first factor, regarding adults’ description of their sociopolitical ideology, remained static. Overall, 31% said they are mostly conservative on social and political issues while just half as many – 14% – said they are mostly liberal on such matters.

Continue reading at barna.com

The Towers Have Fallen-David Wilkerson

Sept 16, 2001

In 2001, the United States of America was attacked by terrorists in an unprecedented way, awaking America, at least briefly, from her slumber. Most of the world was taken by surprise, but not God’s watchmen. One of these watchmen was the Reverend David Wilkerson, Pastor of Time Square Church in New York City, creator of Teen Challenge, and author of the autobiography, “The Cross and the Switchblade”. As the ruins of the Twin Towers were still smoldering on Sept 16, 2001, Pastor David preached this sermon. In my opinion, it is the most important message that has ever been preached in America. Far from being dated, his words ring more true now than when they were first spoken. Only his references to President Bush will remind you that this is not a current message.

Part one of the message is below. A link to the 4-part playlist is HERE.

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

• Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth  Video – 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out | Current membership: 3324
• Flight Attendant Rebekah Roth  Video – Flight Attendant sheds new light on 9/11
• Firefighter Truth and Unity  Founder: Erik Lawyer (Retired Seattle Firefighter)
• Physics911 (FORENSIC SITE)
• Medical Professional for 9/11 Truth
• Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
• Pilots for 9/11 Truth
• Scholars for 9/11 Truth
• Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
• U.S. Intelligence Agency Veterans for 9/11 Truth

More 9/11 Evidence, Questions, and Answers

• THE TOP 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story
• Debunking The Debunkers
• Vision In Consciousness
• 24 facts that cannot be debunked about 9-11

Possible Modern-Day False Flags

• 17 Unanswered Questions About The Boston Marathon Bombing
• 10 Ways The Paris Shooting Looks Like a Hallmark False Flag Op
• 15 Signs The Charlie Hebdo Attack Was A False Flag
• More Evidence Madrid Bombing was a False Flag Op

Back to Glossary or False Flag